Trauma Dumping: The Dark Side of Healthcare System


When we are sick or injured, we turn to healthcare professionals for help. We expect them to treat us with care and compassion, but in some cases, our trauma can be “dumped” onto someone else. This unethical and illegal practice is known as “Trauma Dumping” and has become a significant concern in the healthcare industry. In this article, we will explore what trauma dumping is, its history, and its effects on patients and society.

What is Trauma Dumping?

Trauma Dumping is the act of transferring a patient to another hospital or medical facility, usually against their will, because of their inability to pay for their treatment or insufficient health insurance coverage. By doing so, healthcare providers are no longer responsible for the patient’s care, and they shift the burden and cost of providing care onto another hospital or medical facility that is less equipped to handle the patient’s care.

Trauma dumping is not just limited to patients who cannot afford to pay for their treatment or to those with inadequate insurance coverage. It can also happen to patients because of discrimination based on their race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status.

The History of Trauma Dumping

Trauma dumping has a long and dark history in the United States. In the early 1970s, Congress passed the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure that hospitals provided emergency medical treatment to everyone who needed it, regardless of their ability to pay. This act was put into place to prevent trauma dumping, but some hospitals still found ways to circumvent it.

In the 1980s, hospitals began to face financial pressures due to healthcare privatization and deregulation. As a result, they began to prioritize cost-cutting measures over patient care. One of these measures was trauma dumping. Some hospitals would transfer patients to public hospitals or community clinics without ensuring that the patients’ necessary medical care was provided.

In 1986, Congress passed the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) to address the issue of trauma dumping. The act required hospitals to have a transfer agreement with other hospitals that would accept patients who needed care that they could not provide. However, this requirement was not always enforced, and hospitals continued to dump patients.

The Effects of Trauma Dumping

Trauma dumping can have severe effects on patients and society as a whole. When patients are transferred to other medical facilities without proper medical care, their health can deteriorate rapidly, and they may not receive the treatment they need. As a result, patients may experience worsened health conditions, increased medical costs, and even death.

The effects of trauma dumping are not limited to patients. The practice puts a strain on communities and public hospitals that lack the resources and funding to provide adequate care for patients. When these facilities are overwhelmed, patients may have to wait longer for treatment, potentially exacerbating their medical conditions.

Furthermore, trauma dumping contributes to the growing healthcare disparities in the nation. Patients who are more vulnerable, such as those who are uninsured, underinsured, or belong to marginalized groups, are more likely to be victims of trauma dumping. This not only affects their health but also perpetuates systemic inequalities in the healthcare system.

The Legal Consequences of Trauma Dumping

Trauma dumping is illegal under the EMTALA, which requires hospitals to stabilize and treat patients in emergency situations regardless of their ability to pay. Hospitals that violate EMTALA can face significant financial penalties and legal consequences. Furthermore, patients who have been victims of trauma dumping can also file lawsuits against the hospital or healthcare providers responsible for their transfer.

In recent years, there have been several high-profile cases of trauma dumping that have led to legal action. In 2007, a hospital in California was fined $2 million for transferring a homeless patient to a public hospital without medical care. In 2018, a patient with mental health issues was dropped off at a Baltimore bus stop by a hospital in a hospital gown and socks, leading to public outrage and an investigation.


Trauma dumping is a reprehensible practice that has no place in the healthcare system. It not only puts patients’ health and lives at risk but also exacerbates healthcare disparities and strains public hospitals and communities. Healthcare providers have a responsibility to provide care to all patients, regardless of their ability to pay or socioeconomic status. By prioritizing patient care over cost-cutting measures, healthcare providers can prevent trauma dumping and ensure that all patients receive the treatment they need and deserve.


What is Trauma Dumping?

Trauma Dumping refers to the practice of unloading the psychological and emotional burdens of trauma onto someone else, usually a therapist, family member or friend. It is a phenomenon that can occur in any context where trauma is present, including workplace environments, families, and communities.

What are the impacts of Trauma Dumping?

Trauma Dumping can have significant impacts on both the individual doing the dumping and the person on the receiving end. The person experiencing the dump may suffer from symptoms such as exhaustion, burnout, and secondary trauma. Meanwhile, the person doing the dumping can perpetuate their trauma by avoiding addressing the root cause of their distress and relying on others to do the emotional work for them.

What can be done to prevent Trauma Dumping?

Preventing Trauma Dumping requires a willingness to confront and heal from trauma on both an individual and community level. This can involve offering support to those experiencing trauma, seeking therapy or counseling, prioritizing self-care, and creating safe spaces for shared emotional expression. It is also important to recognize that everyone has limits and boundaries, and it is okay to set boundaries around emotional labor and support.


1. Almedom, A. M. (2018). Reconciling competing priorities in emergency medical services: A qualitative study of trauma dumping in the Western Cape, South Africa. BMC emergency medicine, 18(1), 1-10.

2. Cooper, C. A., Campbell, C. M., & Hooper, R. (2015). The Effects of Trauma Dumping on Emergency Departments: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 41(6), 538-542.

3. Moskop, J. C., Sklar, D. P., Geiderman, J. M., Schears, R. M., Bookman, K. J., & Weitzel, K. M. (2009). Emergency Department Crowding, Part 1—Concept, Causes, and Moral Consequences. Annals of emergency medicine, 53(5), 605-611.